TrackBack

Live public data. FEC 2024 election cycle · official bulk filings (pipeline Aug 16, 2026 · votes Aug 16, 2026). Sources: FEC, LDA.gov, GovTrack, Congress.gov.

537 members · 137 lobbying orgs · Legal & commitments

TrackBack is and will remain free, open source, and non-commercial. No advertising. No paywall. No paid data access. Ever.

Public accountability · America 250

They track us. We track them back.

Citizen money vs institutional money. Every disclosed industry. Every vote we can tie to the dollars — from legal public FEC filings and GovTrack records.

TrackBack's view: Congress should be funded by the people it serves — not by concentrated PACs and outside spenders. Scores are opinionated analytics of public records, not criminal findings.

Works with any valid U.S. zip code — start with your own.

Citizen money vs institutional money

Who funds this office?

People = itemized individual receipts. Institutions = PACs, party committees, and transfers — FEC 2024 cycle. Not a legal finding; a transparent split of public filings.

Mostly people-funded this cycle
People

American people

Individual itemized donors

74%

$2725.7M

Institutions

Institutions

PACs, parties & transfers

26%

$982.2M

National aggregate across members with FEC receipt data this cycle — not a single candidate.

No industry is invisible

Influence classes we track

Original icons. Public FEC classifications. Every concentrated interest treated the same way — we show the dollars, not a hit list of countries or logos.

Pharma & biotech

Pharma & biotech

Drugmakers, biotech PACs, trade groups

Healthcare

Healthcare

Insurers, hospital systems, health PACs

Finance

Finance

Banks, asset managers, fintech PACs

Auto & manufacturing

Auto & manufacturing

Automakers and industrial committees

Gambling industry

Gambling industry

Casino and gaming-linked contributions

Energy

Energy

Oil, gas, and energy-sector money

Defense

Defense

Defense and aerospace committees

Super PACs

Super PACs

Outside spend for or against candidates

TrackBack's view: members should be funded by the people they represent — not by concentrated institutional money. How scoring works →

National Leaderboards

Who's cleanest — and who's most institution-funded — in Congress right now

Cleanest in Congress

Highest Purity Scores — hover score for FEC formula

  1. 1
    Pablo José Hernández

    Pablo José Hernández

    DemocratHouse · PR
    100

    PhRMA

    Amigos De Pablo Jose ($43K)Fernandez Ferrer, Gabriel · TRUENORTH CORP. ($10K)
  2. 2
    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

    DemocratHouse · NY
    95

    PhRMA

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For Congress · Political Committees ($51K)Old Town Digital Agency Llc ($15K)
  3. 3
    James C. Moylan

    James C. Moylan

    RepublicanHouse · GU
    95

    PhRMA

    James Moylan For Congress · Political Committees ($87K)Eye Of The Tiger PAC · Political Committees ($5K)
  4. 4
    Paul A. Gosar

    Paul A. Gosar

    RepublicanHouse · AZ
    90

    PhRMA

    Paul Gosar For Congress · Political Committees ($18K)Gosar For Congress · Political Committees ($12K)
  5. 5
    Andy Biggs

    Andy Biggs

    RepublicanHouse · AZ
    88

    PhRMA

    Biggs For Congress · Political Committees ($74K)Allen, Gwynda S · Employer Not Disclosed ($12K)
  6. 6
    Ro Khanna

    Ro Khanna

    DemocratHouse · CA
    86

    PhRMA

    Targeted Platform Media Llc · Telecom & Media ($100K)Ro For Congress Inc. · Political Committees ($24K)
  7. 7
    Rashida Tlaib

    Rashida Tlaib

    DemocratHouse · MI
    85

    PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute

    Rashida Tlaib For Congress · Political Committees ($94K)Malas, Mohannad · Finance & Fintech ($16K)
  8. 8
    Elijah Crane

    Elijah Crane

    RepublicanHouse · AZ
    84

    Gun Rights · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute

    Eli Crane For Congress · Political Committees ($251K)Allegiance Direct Llc ($138K)
  9. 9
    Christopher Murphy

    Christopher Murphy

    DemocratSenate · CT
    82

    Gun Rights · PhRMA

    Friends Of Chris Murphy ($134K)Morrill, William · Employer Not Disclosed ($13K)
  10. 10
    Ben Ray Luján

    Ben Ray Luján

    DemocratSenate · NM
    80

    PhRMA

    People For Ben ($264K)Lujan, Ben Ray ($10K)

Most Compromised

Lowest Purity Scores — top industries & donors dragging score

Purity Scores are analytical interpretations of public FEC and GovTrack data — not official government ratings, legal findings, or accusations of corruption.

  1. 1
    Steny H. Hoyer

    Steny H. Hoyer

    DemocratHouse · MD
    0

    74% from PACs & committees · PhRMA

    74% non-individual FEC money61% PAC dependence
  2. 2
    Deb Fischer

    Deb Fischer

    RepublicanSenate · NE
    0

    59% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace + Gun Rights · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute

    59% non-individual FEC money177% PAC dependence
  3. 3
    Brendan F. Boyle

    Brendan F. Boyle

    DemocratHouse · PA
    0

    73% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace + Pro-Israel Advocacy · PhRMA, Pro-Israel outside spending

    73% non-individual FEC money49% PAC dependence
  4. 4
    Sylvia R. Garcia

    Sylvia R. Garcia

    DemocratHouse · TX
    1

    73% from PACs & committees · United Democracy Project, PhRMA

    73% non-individual FEC money78% PAC dependence
  5. 5
    Gwen Moore

    Gwen Moore

    DemocratHouse · WI
    2

    71% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace · PhRMA

    71% non-individual FEC money70% PAC dependence
  6. 6
    Maxine Waters

    Maxine Waters

    DemocratHouse · CA
    2

    71% from PACs & committees · PhRMA

    71% non-individual FEC money43% PAC dependence
  7. 7
    Roger Williams

    Roger Williams

    RepublicanHouse · TX
    2

    75% from PACs & committees · Gun Rights · 25 lobbying org ties

    75% non-individual FEC money36% PAC dependence
  8. 8
    Jack Bergman

    Jack Bergman

    RepublicanHouse · MI
    2

    68% from PACs & committees · Gun Rights · PhRMA

    68% non-individual FEC money38% PAC dependence
  9. 9
    Sheri Biggs

    Sheri Biggs

    RepublicanHouse · SC
    2

    63% from PACs & committees · Finance & Fintech · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute

    63% non-individual FEC money63% PAC dependence
  10. 10
    Yvette D. Clarke

    Yvette D. Clarke

    DemocratHouse · NY
    3

    71% from PACs & committees · PhRMA

    71% non-individual FEC money70% PAC dependence

What we expose — and how

TrackBack maps every FEC-reported contribution we can classify into 25+ sectors: advocacy spenders, pharma, fossil fuels, agriculture, fintech, defense, labor, civic groups, and more. No accounts. No spin. Just public records, linked to voting behavior.

  • Committee & PAC contributions (FEC pas2)
  • Itemized individual donors + employers (FEC indiv)
  • Outside super PAC spending for/against (FEC IE)
  • Nay votes on donor-industry legislation (GovTrack)

Purity Score

A 0–100 measure of how independent a politician is from special interest money. Higher is cleaner.

All inputs are derived from publicly filed FEC campaign finance data and GovTrack congressional voting records — fully legal, fully transparent.

Base Formula

Base score = 100 minus the percentage of total receipts from non-individual sources (PACs, party committees, transfers) per FEC filings. This is the primary signal — we do not double-penalize the same PAC money twice.

100 − (non-individual FEC contributions %)
Bonuses

Small-donor bonus (+3 to +8) when itemized individual FEC money is a large share of receipts. Voting bonus (+3 to +8) only for Nay votes clearly tied to a top donor industry (GovTrack).

+10 to +20 pts
Penalties

LD-203 lobbyist contributions (−3 to −15), outside super PAC spending ratio (−4 to −12), excess PAC dependence, controversial industries, and tracked lobbying org ties (FEC + LDA.gov). Scores cap at 95 unless outside money, LD-203, and lobbying exposure are all minimal.

−5 to −30 pts
80–100: Clean60–79: Moderate40–59: Compromised0–39: Heavily Compromised

America 250

Know your government — official sources

FEC filings, STOCK Act disclosures, federal spending, fraud reporting, tax policy, and foreign influence — every link goes to a real .gov source or TrackBack's public data.

Open transparency hub →

Sister project

GuardBack

Parent action hub — platform lockdowns, grooming playbooks, and a report router to CyberTipline / NCMEC. Free, open source, same mission energy.

Open GuardBack →

Maker brand

MetaSiigner Labs

Factory to Freedom — local websites, 3D prints, home-lab systems, and stream nights. The shop that funds the mission work.

Visit Labs →