Public accountability · America 250
They track us. We track them back.
Citizen money vs institutional money. Every disclosed industry. Every vote we can tie to the dollars — from legal public FEC filings and GovTrack records.
TrackBack's view: Congress should be funded by the people it serves — not by concentrated PACs and outside spenders. Scores are opinionated analytics of public records, not criminal findings.
Works with any valid U.S. zip code — start with your own.
Citizen money vs institutional money
Who funds this office?
People = itemized individual receipts. Institutions = PACs, party committees, and transfers — FEC 2024 cycle. Not a legal finding; a transparent split of public filings.
American people
Individual itemized donors
74%
$2725.7M
Institutions
PACs, parties & transfers
26%
$982.2M
National aggregate across members with FEC receipt data this cycle — not a single candidate.
No industry is invisible
Influence classes we track
Original icons. Public FEC classifications. Every concentrated interest treated the same way — we show the dollars, not a hit list of countries or logos.
Pharma & biotech
Drugmakers, biotech PACs, trade groups
Healthcare
Insurers, hospital systems, health PACs
Finance
Banks, asset managers, fintech PACs
Auto & manufacturing
Automakers and industrial committees
Gambling industry
Casino and gaming-linked contributions
Energy
Oil, gas, and energy-sector money
Defense
Defense and aerospace committees
Super PACs
Outside spend for or against candidates
TrackBack's view: members should be funded by the people they represent — not by concentrated institutional money. How scoring works →
National Leaderboards
Who's cleanest — and who's most institution-funded — in Congress right now
Cleanest in Congress
Highest Purity Scores — hover score for FEC formula
- 1
100Pablo José Hernández
DemocratHouse · PRPhRMA
Amigos De Pablo Jose ($43K)Fernandez Ferrer, Gabriel · TRUENORTH CORP. ($10K) - 2
95Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
DemocratHouse · NYPhRMA
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For Congress · Political Committees ($51K)Old Town Digital Agency Llc ($15K) - 3
95James C. Moylan
RepublicanHouse · GUPhRMA
James Moylan For Congress · Political Committees ($87K)Eye Of The Tiger PAC · Political Committees ($5K) - 4
90Paul A. Gosar
RepublicanHouse · AZPhRMA
Paul Gosar For Congress · Political Committees ($18K)Gosar For Congress · Political Committees ($12K) - 5
88Andy Biggs
RepublicanHouse · AZPhRMA
Biggs For Congress · Political Committees ($74K)Allen, Gwynda S · Employer Not Disclosed ($12K) - 6
86Ro Khanna
DemocratHouse · CAPhRMA
Targeted Platform Media Llc · Telecom & Media ($100K)Ro For Congress Inc. · Political Committees ($24K) - 7
85Rashida Tlaib
DemocratHouse · MIPhRMA, American Petroleum Institute
Rashida Tlaib For Congress · Political Committees ($94K)Malas, Mohannad · Finance & Fintech ($16K) - 8
84Elijah Crane
RepublicanHouse · AZGun Rights · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute
Eli Crane For Congress · Political Committees ($251K)Allegiance Direct Llc ($138K) - 9
82Christopher Murphy
DemocratSenate · CTGun Rights · PhRMA
Friends Of Chris Murphy ($134K)Morrill, William · Employer Not Disclosed ($13K) - 10
80Ben Ray Luján
DemocratSenate · NMPhRMA
People For Ben ($264K)Lujan, Ben Ray ($10K)
Most Compromised
Lowest Purity Scores — top industries & donors dragging score
Purity Scores are analytical interpretations of public FEC and GovTrack data — not official government ratings, legal findings, or accusations of corruption.
- 1
0Steny H. Hoyer
DemocratHouse · MD74% from PACs & committees · PhRMA
74% non-individual FEC money61% PAC dependence - 2
0Deb Fischer
RepublicanSenate · NE59% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace + Gun Rights · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute
59% non-individual FEC money177% PAC dependence - 3
0Brendan F. Boyle
DemocratHouse · PA73% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace + Pro-Israel Advocacy · PhRMA, Pro-Israel outside spending
73% non-individual FEC money49% PAC dependence - 4
1Sylvia R. Garcia
DemocratHouse · TX73% from PACs & committees · United Democracy Project, PhRMA
73% non-individual FEC money78% PAC dependence - 5
2Gwen Moore
DemocratHouse · WI71% from PACs & committees · Defense & Aerospace · PhRMA
71% non-individual FEC money70% PAC dependence - 6
2Maxine Waters
DemocratHouse · CA71% from PACs & committees · PhRMA
71% non-individual FEC money43% PAC dependence - 7
2Roger Williams
RepublicanHouse · TX75% from PACs & committees · Gun Rights · 25 lobbying org ties
75% non-individual FEC money36% PAC dependence - 8
2Jack Bergman
RepublicanHouse · MI68% from PACs & committees · Gun Rights · PhRMA
68% non-individual FEC money38% PAC dependence - 9
2Sheri Biggs
RepublicanHouse · SC63% from PACs & committees · Finance & Fintech · PhRMA, American Petroleum Institute
63% non-individual FEC money63% PAC dependence - 10
3Yvette D. Clarke
DemocratHouse · NY71% from PACs & committees · PhRMA
71% non-individual FEC money70% PAC dependence
What we expose — and how
TrackBack maps every FEC-reported contribution we can classify into 25+ sectors: advocacy spenders, pharma, fossil fuels, agriculture, fintech, defense, labor, civic groups, and more. No accounts. No spin. Just public records, linked to voting behavior.
- →Committee & PAC contributions (FEC pas2)
- →Itemized individual donors + employers (FEC indiv)
- →Outside super PAC spending for/against (FEC IE)
- →Nay votes on donor-industry legislation (GovTrack)
Purity Score
A 0–100 measure of how independent a politician is from special interest money. Higher is cleaner.
All inputs are derived from publicly filed FEC campaign finance data and GovTrack congressional voting records — fully legal, fully transparent.
Base score = 100 minus the percentage of total receipts from non-individual sources (PACs, party committees, transfers) per FEC filings. This is the primary signal — we do not double-penalize the same PAC money twice.
Small-donor bonus (+3 to +8) when itemized individual FEC money is a large share of receipts. Voting bonus (+3 to +8) only for Nay votes clearly tied to a top donor industry (GovTrack).
LD-203 lobbyist contributions (−3 to −15), outside super PAC spending ratio (−4 to −12), excess PAC dependence, controversial industries, and tracked lobbying org ties (FEC + LDA.gov). Scores cap at 95 unless outside money, LD-203, and lobbying exposure are all minimal.
America 250
Know your government — official sources
FEC filings, STOCK Act disclosures, federal spending, fraud reporting, tax policy, and foreign influence — every link goes to a real .gov source or TrackBack's public data.
Open transparency hub →Sister project
GuardBack
Parent action hub — platform lockdowns, grooming playbooks, and a report router to CyberTipline / NCMEC. Free, open source, same mission energy.
Open GuardBack →Maker brand
MetaSiigner Labs
Factory to Freedom — local websites, 3D prints, home-lab systems, and stream nights. The shop that funds the mission work.
Visit Labs →